Visit the WYVERN Team at NBAA BACE Oct 17-19 at Booth C12036!

The Hidden Hazard—Cognitive Bias in Aerospace Safety

We’ve Engineered for Everything—Except the Way We Think

In aerospace, we engineer redundancies, automate safeguards, and systematize risk management. Yet, one of the most persistent threats to safety doesn’t come from hardware or software—it comes from human cognition.

Cognitive bias refers to systematic, unconscious errors in thinking that shape how individuals perceive and respond to information. Psychologists have identified more than 180 distinct cognitive biases—each capable of subtly distorting judgment, decision-making, and behavior. In high-reliability sectors like aerospace, these biases can compromise everything from troubleshooting logic to risk communication. They influence how maintenance engineers interpret discrepancies, how pilots react under pressure, how safety officers prioritize events, and how leadership perceives organizational risk exposure.

While the landscape of bias is broad, let’s focus on a few of the most influential ones in the aerospace domain:

✅ Confirmation Bias

“I’ve seen this before—it’s probably nothing.”

This bias leads individuals to seek out or interpret information that reinforces their beliefs while discounting contradictory evidence. In maintenance, this might look like repeatedly deferring a minor recurring fault because prior inspections showed no immediate risk—despite mounting evidence that suggests otherwise. In flight operations, it could mean discounting conflicting instrument data because it doesn’t align with what the pilot “expects to see.”

WYVERN’s CASS (Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System) integration with our Safety Management System (SMS) software counters this by surfacing trend anomalies—even those that seem minor or familiar—through objective data patterns. By making the unseen visible, we help professionals challenge assumptions and break the bias loop before it escalates into failure.

✅ Optimism Bias

“We’ve never had an issue before—why worry now?”

Optimism bias leads individuals to believe they’re less likely to experience a negative outcome compared to others. This can show up in an organization’s confidence that a procedural deviation is harmless because it’s never caused a problem—until it does. It can also affect how safety managers triage reports, unintentionally prioritizing best-case scenarios over worst-case preparedness.

WYVERN’s SMS combats this with structured risk assessment methodologies which quantify exposure and likelihood objectively—removing wishful thinking from the equation. Our dashboards reflect what’s real, not what we hope is true.

✅ Authority Bias

“They outrank me—they must be right.”

In high-pressure environments, team members may defer to seniority even when their instincts tell them something is wrong. This bias can hinder open communication in maintenance teams, lead to missed errors during inspections, or suppress dissenting voices during safety reviews.

WYVERN promotes safety cultures that reward speaking up. Our digital platforms encourage collaborative analysis and confidential and even anonymous reporting when needed, and our processes are designed to validate facts over titles. Tools like performance tracking, cross-check validation, and transparent decision logs ensure that logic—not hierarchy—drives safety decisions.


These aren’t abstract psychology terms—they are real-world risk amplifiers, cited in incident reports, audit findings, and investigative outcomes across flight decks, hangars, and safety offices.

At WYVERN, we believe that safety requires more than just following procedures—it demands cognitive clarity. Our evolved SMS with integrated CASS go beyond basic oversight. They’re built to:

🗸 Surface hidden patterns and trend anomalies

🗸 Challenge status quo thinking through evidence

🗸 Empower decision-makers with meaningful, unbiased data

🗸 Foster team-wide engagement in safety communication

Bias is not a personal weakness—it’s a human constant. However, when embedded into an organization’s culture and decision-making, it becomes a systemic hazard. WYVERN equips aerospace professionals with the tools, training, and insight to identify, understand, and overcome these limitations—turning unconscious tendencies into conscious safety improvements.


Looking Ahead

In Part 2, we’ll explore how organizations can build resilience against bias by embedding cognitive safeguards into their safety architecture—from peer debriefs to algorithmic cross-checks. See how WYVERN empowers aerospace teams to think critically, act decisively, and lead safely.

If you are not subscribed to our weekly newsletters, subscribe now at the bottom of this page. For further resources and guidance on implementing Safety Management Systems, contact WYVERN, THE industry expert. Attend our SMS Training Workshops or ask about our SMS software. Contact us for a FREE SMS demo! Together, we can elevate aerospace safety and create a safer future.

References

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Benson, B. (2016). The Cognitive Bias Codex: A Visual of 180+ Biases. Better Humans. Retrieved from https://betterhumans.pub/cognitive-bias-cheat-sheet-55a472476b18

Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.). Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance & Inspection. FAA. Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/maintenance_hf

EUROCONTROL. (2013). From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2437.pdf

Share this article on social media!

Follow us on social media!