Social Norms in Action: How Group Pressure Shapes Safety

Summary

Last week, we introduced subjective norms—the invisible social pressures that guide behavior. This week, we take a closer look at how those pressures play out in aerospace. Sometimes they steer teams toward safer choices, like speaking up or diverting in poor weather. Other times, they pull crews into risky shortcuts, such as skipping checklists because “that’s how it’s done here.” Most importantly, we explore how leaders and teams can shift norms—through psychological safety, modeling, and reinforcement—so that the “normal” way is the safe way.

The Power of the Group

Social norms aren’t just background noise. They quietly set the tone for what feels acceptable. Whether you’re in the flight deck, the hangar, or the office, most of us are scanning for cues: What’s everyone else doing? What’s expected here? More often than not, that sense of expectation guides behavior—even when it runs against training or common sense.

Everyday Life Examples

• Driving down the highway, if every car is going ten miles over the limit, it’s hard to be the lone one sticking to the posted speed.
• In meetings, once the boss nods at an idea, people usually stop challenging it. Silence becomes the safe response.
• As passengers, we’ve all seen it: the second one person pops up after the seatbelt sign goes off, half the cabin is suddenly in the aisle—even though the ride might still be bumpy.

Aviation & Aerospace Examples

• Checklist Discipline: If the captain skips a checklist and the first officer stays quiet, the “shortcut” becomes quietly accepted.
• Hangar Culture: New technicians pick up cues fast. If they see experienced colleagues cutting corners, it doesn’t take long before “the book” starts gathering dust.
• Operational Pressure: Crews who watch others stretch fuel or push into questionable weather—and face no pushback—may start to think that’s just how things are done.
• Positive Norms: In organizations with strong safety cultures, speaking up and following procedures are simply “how we do things.” Those norms become self-reinforcing and keep risk in check.

Shaping Norms Toward Safety

Here’s the key point: norms aren’t set in stone. They shift all the time. The question is whether they drift on their own—or whether leaders and teams step in to guide them.

• Create Psychological Safety: People are more likely to speak up if they know they won’t be punished for it. When concerns are welcomed—and acted on—staying silent starts to feel out of place.
• Model and Reward Speaking Up: A first officer who catches a rushed step, or a mechanic who pauses to confirm a detail, deserves thanks, not criticism. When leaders notice and appreciate those actions, they quietly set a new expectation for everyone else.
• Use Leadership Influence Wisely: Norms flow downhill. If a chief pilot insists on checklist discipline or a director openly supports a conservative diversion, the message spreads fast: safety isn’t optional here—it’s who we are.
• Reinforce Positive Norms: Stories matter. Sharing examples where teams made the safe call—or backed each other up—keeps those actions alive in the culture. Over time, those stories become the norm.

What Research Shows

Decades of research on the Theory of Planned Behavior suggest that subjective norms don’t always carry the most weight on their own. Attitudes and a sense of control often matter more (Armitage & Conner, 2001). But here’s the catch: when norms are backed by a strong safety climate, they become powerful.

In aerospace, two points stand out:

• Policies aren’t enough. If what people actually do (descriptive norm) doesn’t match what they’re told to do (injunctive norm), behavior usually follows the group.
• Safety climate and leadership amplify norms. Studies show that when leaders consistently model safe behavior, and the safety climate supports it, norms quickly line up behind safety (Fogarty & Shaw, 2010; Wallace & Chen, 2006).

The lesson? Good intentions only hold under pressure if the culture has their back.

Why This Matters

Social norms are invisible, but they draw the line around what feels “normal.” In aerospace, that line can either drift toward shortcuts or hold firm around safe practices. By creating psychological safety, encouraging people to speak up, and modeling conservative decisions, leaders can steer norms in the right direction—and strengthen every layer of defense.

Looking Ahead

Next week, we’ll discuss Perceived Behavioral Control—what happens when someone wants to act safely, but doesn’t feel capable?

If you are not subscribed to our weekly newsletters, subscribe now at the bottom of this page. For further resources and guidance on implementing Safety Management Systems, contact WYVERN, THE industry expert. Attend our SMS Training Workshops or ask about our SMS software. Contact us for a FREE SMS demo! Together, we can elevate aerospace safety and create a safer future.

References

• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001).Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.
• Fogarty, G. J., & Shaw, A. (2010). Safety climate and the theory of planned behavior: Towards the prediction of unsafe behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(5), 1455–1459.
• Wallace, J. C., & Chen, G. (2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self‐regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 529–557.